BREAKING NEWS

Category 5

?max-results="+numposts2+"&orderby=published&alt=json-in-script&callback=recentarticles6\"><\/script>");

Category 6

?max-results="+numposts5+"&orderby=published&alt=json-in-script&callback=recentarticles8\"><\/script>");

Category 7

Saturday 12 October 2013

Browser Wars: Chrome vs. IE10 vs. Firefox vs Maxthon


With Internet Explorer 10 finally available to Windows 7 users, the emergence of Maxthon as unique powerhouse among web browsers, and Firefox andChrome continually bumping up version numbers and adding new standards support and more speed, it's high time for another round of our Browser Wars! Truth be told: Today's major browsers are all so good that picking a winner can be tough.
So how do you pick a Web browser? The first consideration is whether the browser actually runs on your computer. For this shoot-out, we focus on Windows PCs (which is why we omit the excellent Apple Safari), but most browsers come in flavors for other operating systems. If you want to run the new Internet Explorer 10, you'll only be able to do so if you've got a PC running Window 8 or Windows 7. The other main Windows options—Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Maxthon (in order of popularity)—all run on Windows versions back to XP, and they're all available to users of Apple Mac computers, too.
Ubuntu users will be best served by Firefox, which comes with the OS by default. Ubuntu users are likely the kind of folks who want all of Firefox's customizability. But Chrome and Opera are also available for the open-source OS, though you'll have to add their repositories, since they don't show up in the default Ubuntu Software Center.
FEATURED IN THIS ROUNDUP
Chrome 25

Chrome Instant means your Web page is ready to read before you finish typing the address. This, its speed and minimalist design have deservedly been attracting more and more users to the browser. Leading HTML5 support means it will be ready for the future, application-like Web. Hardware acceleration adds even more speed, and though Google has implemented Do Not Track privacy protection (set to off by default), it's probably not the best choice for privacy mavens. Read the full review ››


Firefox 19

Firefox versions keep coming at a fast clip, now that Mozilla hews to a Chrome-like rapid release schedule. These frequent versions haven't brought the kind of earth-shattering changes we used to see in new full-number Firefox updates, but the development teams have tackled issues of importance to a lot of Web users—startup time, memory use, speed, and of course security. This lean, fast, customizable browser can hold its own against any competitor, and it offers graphics hardware acceleration, good HTML5 support, and the unique Panorama system for organizing lots of tabs. Read the full review ››


Internet Explorer 10 (IE10)

Now available for Windows 7 as well as for Windows 8 (but not for Vista or XP), Microsoft's latest browser is faster, trimmer, far more compliant with HTML5—a major improvement over its predecessor. It also brings some unique capabilities like tab-pinning and leading hardware acceleration, and excellent privacy tools like Do Not Track enabled by default and the more-powerful Tracking Protection feature.
Read the full review ››


Maxthon
Maxthon 4

Recently re-dubbed a "Cloud Browser," thanks to its extensive syncing service, Maxthon is the app in this roundup known and used by the fewest people. But it offers among the most in tools, and surprisingly good performance and HTML5 support. If the idea of being able to take a screen capture of a webpage, download video, or switch to a dark view for night viewing appeals to you, give Maxthon a download. Site compatibility is guaranteed, since Maxthon uses both Chrome and IE's webpage rendering engines. The only thing missing is hardware acceleration—yet. Read the full review ››


Opera 12

Like the other current browsers, Opera is fast, compliant with HTML5, and spare of interface. Long an innovator, recently it's added support for HTML5 getUserMedia, which lets webpages access your webcam (with your permission, of course). Opera's Turbo speeds up the Web on slow connections through caching. Extension support actually followed other browsers, but Oslo still impresses with tab stacking, visual mouse gestures, a built-in Bittorrent client, and live Speed Dial tile apps. Read the full review ››
The Speed Factor
Maybe for you, choosing a browser is simply a matter of speed? If so, you'll find that answering the question of which browser is fastest is hardly cut-and-dried, as my article, By the Numbers: the Fastest Browser illustrates. You could run a bunch of synthetic benchmarks, which do offer at least some insight into real-world performance. Here are my latest results on a few of the most often cited JavaScript benchmarks run on a mediocre 2.5GHz dual-core laptop:
SunSpider 0.9.1
BrowserScore in ms
(lower is better)
Internet Explorer 10180
Google Chrome 25238
Internet Explorer 9260
Firefox 19277
Opera 12302
Maxthon 4328
Google V8 (v.7)
BrowserScore
(higher is better)
Google Chrome 2510111
Maxthon 49703
Firefox 196817
Internet Explorer 104525
Opera 123840
Internet Explorer 92048
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
BrowserScore in ms
(lower is better)
Google Chrome 252660
Maxthon 43156
Firefox 193247
Internet Explorer 108829
Opera 1212336
Internet Explorer 916794
A few takeaways from all this: IE10 is vastly faster than IE9, so if you're a dyed-in-the-wool IE user, definitely upgrade to version 10. Chrome users get automatically updated to the latest version, and that browser perennially yields top showings on browser benchmarks, though Maxthon is nipping at its heels on some of the tests. Firefox consistently posts respectable results in the middle of the pack.
Alternatively, you could just see how fast pages load in each browser, but that's completely dependent on your internet connection. One thing that you can test with some authority is the time it takes for the browser to start up. Here are my results for that one using a mediocre 2.5GHz dual-core laptop:
Startup Time
BrowserCold Startup Time(seconds)Warm Startup Time(seconds)
Internet Explorer 102.50.9
Internet Explorer 93.01.3
Chrome 253.10.8
Firefox 193.31.1
Maxthon 44.31.5
Opera 1210.12.9
Again, pretty close, aside from Opera's poor initial startup time, though its restarts are fast enough. This is clearly not the main differentiator among browsers anymore, and if you have a reasonably new PC, you won't notice a significant delay in startup.

Another overriding criterion is the browsers' standards compliance. You certainly want the program to be able to correctly display the sites you visit. Though HTML5 isn't yet an official standard of the Web's governing body, the W3C, it's being used by more and more sites, and support is increasing in the browsers. One test of this new support is theHTML5Test.com site, which reports a score based on supported HTML5 features out of a possible 500 points, along with bonus points for extra capabilities not technically part of HTML5. Here's how the current crop of browsers pan out on this one:
HTML5Test.com
BrowserScore (higher is better)Bonus Points
Maxthon 446415
Chrome 2546313
Opera 124199
Firefox 1939310
Internet Explorer 103206
Internet Explorer 91385
Here you can see that IE10 finally gets in the 300s, a vast improvement over its predecessor, though a significant amount of ground still remains between it and the leaders, Maxthon and Chrome.

How to Install Windows 8 Without CD or USB


1. Download the ISO disk image from:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/iso?SignedIn=1
You can then mount the disk image using a utility like Daemon Tools, Alcohol, MagicDisc or some other tool of your choice.
Warning: DO NOT run the auto run installer. It upgrades your system in place with no option to install and run from another partition.
2. Look for the folder name “sources” on the virtual install disk you mounted in step 1.
3. Run setup.exe from that folder and follow the steps to install on another partition.
Once installed, you can have your first taste of Windows 8 and its new user interface.
TO support us like Us ON Facebook Page


Google to Use Your Data in Ads Via 'Shared Endorsements'


Google on Friday announced an update to its terms of service that outlines how it might use your content in advertisements across its network.
For those with a Google Account, a +1 you give or review you write might be used alongside an advertisement for the business you endorsed. "The +1 you gave your favorite local bakery could be included in an ad that the bakery runs through Google," the company said.
The ads have been dubbed shared endorsements, and will only be displayed to people in your social circle, or those with whom you've opted to share information like +1s and reviews. If you don't want Google using your information, you can opt out by navigating to the shared endorsement setting, unchecking the box at the bottom, and clicking "Save."
The setting will be on by default, but if you previously told Google that you did not want your +1's to appear in ads, then of course we'll continue to respect that choice as a part of this updated setting," Google said.
Google made the change to the "Your Content in our Services" section of its terms of service. The new text reads: "If you have a Google Account, we may display your Profile name, Profile photo, and actions you take on Google or on third-party applications connected to your Google Account (such as +1's, reviews you write and comments you post) in our Services, including displaying in ads and other commercial contexts. We will respect the choices you make to limit sharing or visibility settings in your Google Account. For example, you can choose your settings so your name and photo do not appear in an ad."
Meanwhile, Google will also display your +1s or reviews in non-ad content. If you gave a 4-star review to a band's album on Google Play, for example, your friend might see that review displayed when he navigates to the band's Google Play page. There's no way to opt out of this.
Facebook landed in hot water when it used members' content in advertisements via a program known as "Sponsored Stories." Users who were unaware that they were basically being used as unpaid spokespeople sued Facebook, which was eventually required to hand over $20 million in a settlement.
Google's terms of service update, meanwhile, also included sections warning people to use their mobile devices safely (translation: don't text and drive), as well as warnings about password safety.
 
Copyright © 2013 Ujenzi Online
Share on Blogger Template Free Download. Powered byBlogger